After going through some reviews of Nads on the infomercial, it is totally unclear to me what it does. Does it make hair grow back (on someone’s back) or does it make hair go away?
Because Nads is supposed to be growing hair on a hairy back. Why would anyone want a hairy back? What culture is this? Why would anyone want one?
So people are looking at these four pictures of a man’s back where the first photo is totally without hair, and it grows gradually until the fourth photo where his hair could qualify him to play King Kong in a movie. At least, for the back shots. Two links were attached. And the discussion ensued. Did he ever even lose hair on his back in the first place?
France, now that’s another story. When I was a child, I was told that French women did not shave their underarms as it was considered sexy. Now there is this ad for Nads hair removal gel supposedly, seen in France. But Nads is here presented as an alternative to shaving. The ad was seen on a street in Paris. So I ask again, what does Nads do?
Even before the mystery is resolved as to the actual use of Nads, someone points out a Nads review website that she loves not for the infomercial, but for the comical review. Does she care about the product? No, she says it is “Not the product; the INFOMERCIAL.”
We are left with varied scenarios: Both Nads are different products. Both products are the same, but are misunderstood. No one knows what Nads does. No one cares if they are the same or different. Unless someone buys Nads and then wonders what they are supposed to do with it.
